Let Us Now Praise . . . Alan McLeod (Again)

As some of you realize, I'm a big fan of common sense, reason, facts, and, well, good thinking.

Which is why I'm a fan of Alan McLeod, the brains behind A Good Beer Blog. A prime example is his recent essay about blogging, "professionals," "amateurs," and a whole lotta other topics in between. No, I'm not a beer blogger or a beer writer --- but I so appreciate good writing and thinking regardless of topic. I hope you to, too.

Which is why you oughta read Alan's blog. (And, no, I didn't know that I'd inadvertently referred him, via Stan, to the piece that inspired this instance of rumination. Frankly, and as I noted a day or so ago, I'm a bit baffled that anyone reads my tweets. Who knew?)

(Yes, I know that's irrational: Presumably I bother tweeting because I assume someone's going to read the tweet. Certainly that's my hope. In my experience, however, life is chock-ablock with unrealized hopes and so, ya know....)

"Profood" v. "Industrial" Food. Where Is the Middle Ground?

As some of you know, I'm writing a history of meat in modern America ("modern" in this case meaning 1870-2000) so I try to stay current with what's what in the world of food and food politics. So naturally I read up on things like the "profood" movement. I inadvertently hurt some feelings with a Tweet I posted yesterday, and for that I apologize. (Frankly, it never occurred to me that anyone would actually READ the Tweet.) My tweet was as follows:

I have come to the conclusion that the "profood" people are, um, out of touch with reality.

The "profood" in this case refers to a group of people who advocate changes in the American food system. You can read more about it here. As near as I can tell, profood types are all about the "family farm" and sustainable foods and eating local. They also want better food, more "real" food served in, for example, hospitals and schools.

I admire their energy and agree with their general thrust: I hate the idea that the nation's schoolkids are eating crap every day. And I become almost unhinged every time I see an adult hand a two-year-old a coke or a bottle of "apple juice." (Which is mostly corn syrup.)

So I'm all in favor of eating well. (And if you read this blog, you know I practice what I preach.

And I'm also keenly aware that millions of people rely on "convenience" foods out of both choice and necessity.)

My problem with this "movement" is its simplistic approach to a complex problem. The profood people, inadvertently or intentionally, are demonizing the existing food system. As near as I can tell, they hope to achieve their goals in part by tossing the baby out with the bathwater, or, in this case, the entire existing food/farming system out with the foodproducer/farmer.

As one farmer said, they'd like to force him to live in the 19th century, while they get to live in the 21st. That won't work. There is no way "family farms" and "local foods" are going to feed 250 million people. No way. No how. (And that's only counting the people here in the US. There's also the matter of foods exported to other countries.)

But here's my biggest fear about "profood." They're (unintentionally) advocating what amounts to a two-tier food system. One system --- local, sustainable, organic, etc. --- for the rich. And "industrial" food for the rest of us. Because "local" food produced on "family farms" is expensive food.

And here's the brutal reality that seems to escape the profood people: Many Americans rely on "industrial" food to fill their stomachs because that's the food they can afford. They can't shop at the groovy local "coop" store (aka "health food store") and buy those four dollar quarts of "local" milk and those two dollar local tomatoes. Or those three dollar heads of organic kale.

Moreover, millions of working Americans can't take time to plant food and then can or process the harvests. Because, ya know, they're too busy working for a living.

That's what I mean when I wrote that some profood people are "out of touch with reality."

So I'm all "profood" and I favor changes in our food system --- but turning back the clock and/or creating a two-tier food system isn't the way to go. Put those carrots on the school lunch tray, please! But just know that the schools will only be able to pay for those carrots when the carrots are grown in the most efficient way possible: On a large "industrial" farm.

Otherwise, only a few will get carrots. And many will get none at all.

First Draft Follies: Woodstock

Welcome to First Draft Follies, an ongoing series here at the blog. The material is presented "as is" from the first draft of the manuscript that became the book Ambitious Brew. In a few places I added one or two words in brackets -- [like this] -- for clarification.

This edition is particularly folly-ish, and prime example of how easily I wander off-track when something interesting catches my brain. Because let's face it: Woodstock had nuthin' much to do with beer. For the record: I was not at Woodstock. Indeed, I was not even aware it was happening. (I was an exceptionally oblivious fifteen-year-old.)

_______

Eight hundred miles east of Milwaukee, four men of disparate personalities and backgrounds were organizing an event that they hoped would make them rich. They planned to hold the Woodstock Music and Art Fair in August in rural upstate New York.

The quartet spent the summer of ‘69 lining up acts; researching the merits of temporary toilets; signing food vendors, and scrambling to find a location after their first choice was snatched from them at the last moment. Hugh Romney and the Hog Farm commune agreed to operate a free food kitchen, babysit kids on bad trips, and provide concert “security.” (For that task, Romney informed a Woodstock Ventures representative, he would require “‘fifty cases of seltzer bottles and three truckloads of chocolate cream pies as ammunition.’”) (*1)

By opening day, August 15, 1969, a city-sized swarm of hippies, heads, and freaks had established camp at Max Yasgur’s farm. Outside the site, vehicular traffic overwhelmed the region’s roads and highways.

The cops, fearing the worse, blockaded the parking lots, a decision that exacerbated the chaos and produced the largest traffic jam in New York state history. Thousands of people abandoned their cars and walked the last several miles.

For three days, a crowd estimated at anywhere from 100,000 to a half a million, listened to music, danced, sang, made love, died (two people), and sloshed through odorous mud spawned by torrential rain.

The “official” food supply--hot dogs and hamburgers--ran out almost before singer Richie Havens, who went on first because the opening act was stuck in traffic, plucked a guitar string. “Bring food,” the organizers begged the outside world.

That was easier said than done, thanks to abandoned vehicles and barricaded highways. Locals who knew the back roads delivered carloads of cold cuts, water, soda, and fruit juice, but, given that all the nearby towns combined were not as large as Woodstock City, their efforts fed the encampment’s fringes but not much more.

No matter. Most attendees were beyond caring about food. Kids drank acid-laced kool-aid and water, smoked and ate hash, ingested god-knows what other drugs, and guzzled wine from that basic hippie accoutrement, the goatskin.

Beer was conspicuous by its absence. Art Vassmer, who owned a general store in nearby Kauneonga Lake, sold out his stock of six-packs. Some kids hauled in coolers loaded with beer, but that ran out long before the music did. A local bar owner showed up with a truck loaded with beer.

It sold “like crazy,” less because kids craved beer than because liquid of any sort was welcome on a hot day in August in a temporary city cut off from the outside world.(*2)

Nor did any of the long-haired, mud-soaked trippers care whether the national beverage was available or not. Who needed beer when pot, hash, and acid were as accessible as the air and rain and far more fun?

_______________

*1: Robert Stephen Spitz, Barefoot in Babylon: The Creation of the Woodstock Music Festival, 1969 (New York: The Viking Press, 1989), 90. *2: Joel Makower, Woodstock: The Oral History (New York: Doubleday, 1989), 217.

Miller[Coors] v. Anheuser-Busch DukeOut. Round . . . Two?

This is worth coming out of hiberation for. Jeremiah McWilliams, the fabbo Lager Heads guy for the St. Louis-Post Dispatch, notes an interview with the CEO at MillerCoors. Here's the money quote:

“We are writing beer history, and this is a trip,” Kiely told Sterrett. “This is a game that will play out over the next 25 years in the beer business, and I will be watching this from my rocking chair.”

Hey! What I been sayin' all along! Although I hope it won't take 25 years, if only because I'd like to know how it comes out. If history is any guide, however, it'll be over with in about five years.

Gone Fishin' . . . For Facts and Words

I took most of last week off because The Baby was here visiting (with his mama and daddy), which necessitated much cooking (because, yes, I do cook) and ga-ga-goo-ing, etc. No surprise, I got almost no work done. And now must make up for that fact.

So --- blogging will run slow for a week or so. Ya know: Until I get sufficiently annoyed about something rant about it in another five-part saga.