'Tis The Season For Seasonal Beers

A few months back, I blogged about the "seasonal beer" site hosted by the Brewers Association.(*1) Since today is December 1, and the "holiday" season is (theoretically) in full swing, I'm reposting the link. It's a nifty idea, is the BA's seasonal beer site: Click on the "Browse Seasonal Releases" link, choose the season and your state, and a list of available seasonal releases will show up. There's a description of each beer, plus some suggestions for food pairings.(*2)

Enjoy!

_______________________________

*1: Ohdeargod, I can't believe I just typed the word "blogged." That it should come to this....

*2: The only annoying thing is that each outlet of the chain restaurants/brewpubs is listed individually, so, for example, seasonal beers at the Granite City chain are listed over and over and over and over again. Irritating. But we'll get over it, right? Goodwill toward humans, fa la la la la, and all that.

Update On New York Liquor Laws And Tuthilltown Spirits

Back in February, I posted an entry about a particularly inane liquor-related law in New York.

I just got a follow-up about that episode from the person featured in it, Ralph Erenzo of Tuthilltown Spirits Distillery in Gardiner, New York. He posted his comment at the original post, but I re-post it here for the edification of all:

Update: After we managed to get Gov. Spitzer to sign the Farm Distillers law, the State Liquor Authority interpreted the law strictly and required holders of the A-1 micro distiller's license to give up that license to acquire the Farm Distillers license (which for us would have meant dropping half our product for the right to have a tasting room and direct sale to consumers). The SLA insisted we must start another company, in a different building, build a new distillery to acquire the Farm Distillery license. It took another round of legislation to amend the law to include the specific words permitting the holding of both an A-1 and a Farm Distillers license concurrently. Gov. Paterson signed S2075 into law recently which specifically permits distillers to hold various licenses at the same time (the way wineries and breweries have been able to do for years).

Sooooo...... something for which to be thankful on this day of thanks. Now, if only various other dumbass liquor laws could or would be changed so that I could buy some of Tuthilltown's products and have them delivered to me here in Iowa.

Sigh. That day may never come............

I'll have to wait till next time I'm in NYC and then, gee, make a trip to Gotham Bar or MOMA restaurant or one of those other dens of iniquity that sell exquisite fabulous food and drink so I can taste some of Ralph's wares and won't THAT be a hardship??

Great Example Of Ahistorical [Beer] Reporting

It's been sort of hot news lately (hot, at least, among beer people): China's Snow beer is on the verge of becoming the world's biggest selling beer, elbowing Current King Beer -- Bud Light -- of the throne it's held since 2003. So today's Guardian (a British newspaper) has an article about this moment in beer history.

But -- oy -- could the reporter have done a little research first? A little historical research? Case in point: the reporter's claim that the Chinese "have been developing a taste for home-grown" beer. Oh? They "developed" that taste many years ago.

When I first visited China in 1987, the place was awash in local beers. My husband and I found a bit of Heinken and Busweiser in two major cities; we found Tsingtao in a few upscale, urban eateries. Otherwise, it was local beer all the time. (Great beer, too. Most of it was unpasteurized and each one tasted different.)

So I don't think the Chinese are only now discovering "local" beer. The reporter also says that Snow's success is due to China's "the growing thirst of Chinese drinkers for beer."

Again: Huh? The Chinese have been downing bazillions of gallons (or liters) of beer for a long time, if only because there aren't that many hydration options. Potable water, for example, was (and still is) hard to come by. (Indeed, in 1987, I had a tough time figuring out how to fill the water bottle I'd brought with me. I developed a system, using the boiled water our hotel rooms always had on hand for tea. In 1999, I was able to find bottled water in a few cities.)

So until fairly recently, people's choices in the People's Republic have been tea, local soft drinks, or beer. In recent years, soft drinks have become more ubiquitous, as has bottled water, meaning that, if anything, the Chinese may be drinking less beer rather than more.

So: I'm not buying the explanation for Snow's ascent.

On a different note: it's also not clear that Snow has killed the King. Numbers in the beer industry vary, because it matters who is counting what. For example, those numbers for Snow may include all the Snow products, rather than just one label. Eg, the numbers may include Snow, Snow Light, Snow Whatever.

Put another way, the counters may be counting all versions of Snow against just one Anheuser-Busch brand, Bud Light. Obviously, if someone counted all Snow products and all A-B products, the numbers would come out differently.

Top o' the mug to Hunter at Sybeeritic for the link to the Guardian article. (By the way, he gets my vote for having the most creative blog name. Terrific play on words...)

Ain't No Atheists In This (Economic) Foxhole

I can always count on the New York Times' Sunday "Styles" section for my weird-reading-of-the-week.(*1) And this past Sunday was no exception: a long piece about boom times for psychics.

Why is the fortune-telling biz so good these days? Because investors, at a loss (no pun intended) for what direction to turn, are asking psychics for advice about how, where, and when to invest.

My immediate reaction was an eye-rolling "ohgimmeabreak." But then I thought about it some more. And realized that people visiting psychics are doing what humans have done since we began standing upright: Reaching out to that-thing-that-might-be-there in hopes "it" can provide guidance, wisdom, and knowledge. Reaching out to something we sense, rather than something we know.

In short, these investors are turning to the subset of spirituality known as "magic." Other subsets include Christianity, Islam, voodoo, witchcraft, etc. (Although I suspect many would argue that witchcraft and voodoo are all just names for "magic.") I have no substantive point here, other than to admit that my own knee-jerk eye-rolling (how's that for a mix of body parts??) was unwarranted and unfair.

After all, when I fly, I do this: As the plane takes off, I "pray" to whoever/whatever is out there, asking for a safe journey for all the mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, and, especially, the children on the plane. And when we land, I say another "prayer" of thanksgiving that all those people will get home to their loved ones. I'm not praying to any particular person, thing, or place.

Just, well, reaching out beyond my "self" to commune with the universe. Reaching out to that force/power/whatever that enables us to love (because that, in my opinion, is what matters most.) I'm about as areligious, agnostic, and atheistic as it's possible to be, and yet -- if this makes me religious, yes, I confess: I am!

____________________________

*1: The "Styles" section offers up a weekly anthropological excursion through cringe-inducing hipness, and the lives of fashion fascists and the terminally neurotic.

Why Paul Krugman Matters

Last night I was watching a news program on TV -- god knows which one; I watch a lot of news -- and came across an interview with economist Paul Krugman, who was talking about the latest wave of "bailouts" and "stimulus" plans.

Nothing new about that. Krugman is a regular among the TV talking heads. He also a columnist for the New York Times.

Indeed, he's so ubiquitous that it's easy to forget or overlook the obvious:That he's out there communicating with the general public.

Why does that matter? Because most "scholars," especially ones who've won Nobel prizes, don't do that. I mean, when's the last time you read an op-ed piece by a winner of, say, the Nobel for chemistry or physics? But Krugman is using his many talents and shrewd mind to communicate with all of us.

Yes, I know that not everyone is crazy about Krugman, who makes no bones about his political views.

But the point remains: Krugman has chosen to engage with ordinary people. As anyone who knows me knows, that matters to me. I left academia for many reasons, but one of the most important was that I wanted to "do" history for the rest of us. I know that many people leave school loathing history because it's been taught to them as a series of dates and names. I think history has more to offer and it's my mission to share my historical curiousity, and my passion for history, with others.

So, on this Thanksgiving, I'm thankful for Paul Krugman.