United Nations Building As Booze-Free Zone?

This in the NYT about booze, diplomacy, UN. And history (although the reporter didn't mention that last).

. . . there is still a sort of residual 1950s, 1960s feel to the culture,” said Mr. Gowan, whose father was a diplomat. “You do sort of feel that you are sort of stuck in the past.”

I'd be sad to see this alcohol culture change. (*1) Seems more useful and fitting to sustain the Post-World-War-II spirit living in those hallways and meeting rooms.

History matters. It can saturate a space and make it live in ways that we otherwise might not notice.

_________________

*1: A fix? Introduce new and interesting beer and spirits --- and hey! --- Global diplomacy, rejuvenated. And for pennies relative to billions.

My Writer's "Retreat." And How The Sausage Gets Made

This morning's New York Times Book Review included an essay about how writers struggle with online distraction --- even at "legendary" writers' retreats. For those who don't know (and count yourself lucky: these retreats are legends only in their own minds...): some writers apply to to spend time in isolated locations so that they can finish their work without distraction.  

The setup presumably varies from place to place, but essentially the writer gets living space (think small cottage) for a span of time (a month, three months, whatever) and they can write all day without worrying about the phone or making food (it's often delivered to their door). At night, if they like, they can go to a communal space and talk with the other writers on retreat. (*1)

The point of this essay in today's NYTBR is that a) the people who run these retreats struggle with how much digital access to provide; and b) writers find that despite the idyllic circumstances, they slip over to the "wired hub" so they can go online to check Facebook or whatever. The person who wrote the essay discovered his phone got access from one isolated spot on his porch. There went his productivity.

The author also noted that some writers, in their "regular" lives, use software to keep themselves offline:

Many writers try restrictive regimens, whether at a residency or in the outside world. Michael Chabon and Meghan O’Rourke, for example, have installed software programs like Freedom and SelfControl, whose very names evoke a self-help cry for intervention.

I use Freedom and have now for maybe two years? I also use its sister program "Anti-Social," which gives me online access to sites that I want to access, while restricting access to those I don't: So the university library is "on," but Facebook, Twitter, the New York Times, and my email are "off" while I'm working. (*2)

So where am I going with this? Writers' retreats. And how I inadvertently had one in February.

This last push to finish the meat history manuscript was grueling almost beyond belief. I'm not complaining; just stating a fact: I had about eight weeks of work to do in roughly four weeks.

The only way to do it was by working about ten hours a day. And I don't mean what passes for most people's workdays (meaning people who work in offices with lots of other people): go to work; spend ten minutes chatting, spend another fifteen going down the hall to another person's office; thirty minutes at lunch; twenty minutes on the phone. Etc. (That's not a criticism of those people. That's simply how the eight-hour-workday works.)

I mean: ten hours (some days twelve) at my keyboard. About ten minutes for lunch. Peeing when necessary. Otherwise: nothing but focus and concentration. (*3) No housework, no cooking (that part I'd prepared for in advance: I did a lot of cooking and filled the freezer), no errand running, no nothing. (THANK YOU, HUSBAND!)

But here was the beautiful, wondrous aspect:

For ten days of this last push --- ten days during which I still needed to write the final chapter and the introduction and the conclusion and verify hundreds of notes --- my husband was out of town. (*5)

That meant: I TRULY didn't have to deal with anything or anyone. Only the work.

I spent those ten days in a mental cocoon, isolated almost completely from the world around me.

I took my usual mental health breaks (that's "coffee breaks" to the rest of the world) for a few minutes here and there, often digitally. Otherwise: no phone. No going outside (I went out of the house to the end of the driveway to empty the mailbox, and went to the grocery store one time). No socializing. No nothing.

At night: virtually no television (it was too intrusive). I read parts of a novel. Mostly I stared into space. (I'm not kidding. I couldn't handle the mental distraction of, say, a sitcom or CNN.)

It was amazing and wonderful and so fruitful. I was on a free writer's retreat. In my own home. Free! In my own home. Did I mention it was free?

You've NO idea how lucky I was and am to have had those ten days unimpeded. I told my husband when he got home that it was just as well he wasn't there because I probably would have made him leave anyway.

Okay, now back to that point that you sharp-eyed readers noticed a few sentences ago: Once or twice a day during those ten days, I used my iPad to look at email and Facebook and Twitter. Sometimes I posted something. I communicated with a reporter who emailed about a question. Missed out on a talk radio opportunity because I got to my email too late in the day.

And now --- finally! --- the main point:

None of this was the me of, say, six years ago. Back then I struggled to manage the online part of my life. I was addicted to email and writers' forums and the whole nine yards of life online.

There were days when I feared that I would never again know the joy (okay, it's more like ecstasy) of creative "flow" and complete mental immersion.

That prospect terrified me. And I don't use that word lightly.

So I faced up to the issue. I taught myself how to manage the "online" part of my life.

How? By recognizing that it had become part of life. It wasn't something separate and "out there." It was here. It was everywhere. And I HAD to learn how to live with it, rather than in opposition to it.

I had to master this intruder.

Here's how I did that (other than just plain ol' willpower): I bought a second computer. One was connected to the 'net. The other was not. I wrote on the one that was not. When I needed to switch tasks and do, say, research rather than write, I turned on the wired machine. But I made the decision to do so with care and sparingly.

And something happened.

I encountered the obvious: There's nothing that's SO URGENT that it requires our immediate attention. Nuthin.'

And once I got that; once I understood that my presence or absence at, say, Facebook, or a writers' forum I once frequented, or Twitter make zero difference to the rest of the world --- well, my addiction simply faded.

Now I use one computer. And yes, I use Freedom. Less because I can't restrain myself than because using it alleviates that sub-cranial, nagging sense of irritation that is the digital world.

But: I've learned that the irritant, or the sense of the irritant's presence, sets in most often when my brain and eyes need a break. (*6) I've learned to walk away during those "I need a break" moments; walk away rather than go online. It felt much like giving up smoking: Do something else when the urge hits. (I quit smoking in 1986.)

And in that respect, having an iPad is something I could not have done four or five years ago. I had to kick the addiction first. Otherwise --- well, I'dve been on that damn thing constantly.

And, yes, once again, I've led you down this twisted path to a non-earthshaking conclusion: I got a free writer's retreat and how great was that!?

But really? It's probably better to figure out how to get along without a retreat in the first place.

______________

*1: This is where the "legendary" stuff supposedly comes in: Writers talk. Writers drink. Writers hop in the sack. Writers make connections. Writers get better contracts. Etc. Frankly, it sounds to me like a) a total snore; and b) egos in collision. But that's me. And I'm a true loner. (Heh. I initially typed "loser" rather than "loner." The former likely more true than the latter.)

*2: I generally only use Anti-social at specific times in the process: Toward the end, for example, when I was revising and needed to verify citations for my notes. At times like that, I need to use the library's online catalog. But when I'm actually writing (composing), I use only Freedom.

*3: What was I doing? The final, final revision. The "no kidding, this is it, this is the text, this is what goes into print" revision. No mistakes. No typos. The right word in the right place. The ideas expressed clearly, succinctly, and convincingly (meaning they're backed up by shitloads of evidence). Making sure the sources for every quotation --- and there are hundreds of quotations --- are correct, down to the page number and date of publication. I know that doesn't sound like much, but that kind of labor requires a herculean level of mental concentration. It's not the kind of work that can be done on such a tight deadline. At the end of each day, I was completely, absolutely, thoroughly drained of all energy. I wanted to do nothing but sit as still as possible and stare at a wall. Which is what I did at night for a few hours until I crawled into bed, so I could get up and do it again the next day. The one luxury I allowed myself was sleep. I needed it. (*4)

*4: Last time around, the beer history book, I had a horrific episode of insomnia (a ?ailment that I've had since I was seven years old (alas)), a case that ran on for two years. Toward the end, I slept two hours a night, from about ten or eleven to midnight or one. Then I'd get up and work until about six pm. It was so awful. I vowed I would not go that road again. THIS time as I neared the end, about six months ago, I began taking a half a sleeping pill. For this last month-long trek, I took a full pill every night. I was able to sleep six hours, enough to keep my brain focused and fresh.

*5: The first draft of the manuscript was seven chapters. My editor said she wanted a new last chapter. She was, of course, right about the need for it, so I spent December and January writing and researching what is now Chapter Eight. But when Push Time came, that chapter was still in a first-draft version. It needed LOTS of work. In effect, I had to write a new, new chapter.

*6: I've gotta say: this last push was MURDER on my eyes. Wow. They took a beating. Valuable lesson: Look away from the screen and out the window every twenty minutes. At least. I'm working making that a new habit. But I may have to use some kind of chime or timer to remind me until the habit is formed. Do yourself a favor: LOOK AWAY.

The Title. The Jacket. The . . .

The Whatever. Okay. We've got a title and a jacket design. I'm not crazy about the title but it's not bad for a compromise. (*1)   According to Amazon, the book comes out in mid-November. For a non-famous person like me, that means it will be out in mid-October. (*2)

Anyway: here is a virtual representation of the real thing.

Jacket Design Final

__________

*1: As I said in my previous post: Please do NOT bombard me with emails or comments about how I really need to leave the publishing Nazis behind and self-publish. I know the drill. I have my view; you have yours. Self-publishing is part of my future, but that's then. This is now. (Re. the "Nazis" term: One reason I don't read self-publishing blogs anymore is because those who have them tend to be, shall we say, supremely self-righteous. A blog entry on one of said sites described traditional editors/publishers as Nazis. Oooh, boy, did I not ever go back there again.)

*1: Every book has what is known as a "lay-down date," on which the book is released for sale. But those dates are only real for Very Famous Writers, for whom a Big Fuss will be made on that date. For the rest of us, however, the book lands in stores and online whenever it's released from the warehouse. That's typically a month prior to the lay-down day.

What It Looks Like At The End

I thought about finding a photo of a runner breaking through finish-line tape. Then I looked around at and realized --- there lay the image with which to encapsulate the final, extraordinarily stressful push to the end: My office.   Office One

Although these photos don't do it justice. It looks MUCH worse in person. (My friend Anat Baron would reel in horror and run away as fast as she could.)

But toward the end, that's what I was doing: rummaging through file crates hunting for a document (because for most of this long slog, scanning, digital files, etc. weren't readily available; the amount of paper I accumulated dropped off significantly in the final phases as the number of databases and sources increased by a geometric amount). (*1)

Office TWO

It's a mess, isn't it? But a mess has NEVER felt so good.

There's still much to be done as the manuscript moves into production: dealing with copyedits, proofreading, creating the index, compiling a media list, and so forth. But it's a book, folks, it's a BOOK. (Okay, not technically. Technically it's still a manuscript.)

Title is IN MEAT WE TRUST: An Unexpected History of Carnivore America. I'm not crazy about it, but as a compromise (and publishing is one compromise after another), it's not horrible. (*2) The new jacket design will be along any day now and I'll post that when it arrives.

Office THREE

So: what am I doing now? Catching my breath. Sleeping a bit more than I have been. (That last slog was grueling in a way that I won't attempt to describe.) Thinking about my next project and enjoying the anticipation of diving into that. (Because anticipation can be as pleasurable as the act itself, right?)

Oh --- and cleaning up this mess. You've now idea how good it feels to organize the chaos and move the crates to the basement when I'm finished. I'm looking forward to going paperless for the next project, but I'll miss the concrete, in-my-hands, tangible act of packing away hours and weeks and years of reading and thinking and writing.

___________________________

*1: I switched to a Mac ten months ago and my life got SO much easier, organizationally speaking --- although as noted above, the documents I was able to read digitally rather than on paper or on microfilm soared, too. For my next project, I've already begun amassing a strictly digital database. I'd like to get away with no more than one plastic crate full of photocopies.

*2: PLEASE do not zip off a comment or email telling that I REALLY need to self-publish so that I can have full control over the entire work. I know all about it, okay? I don't want another brouhaha like the last time I commented on the virtues of working with traditional publishers. Here's what many people don't get about "traditional" publishing houses: They subsidize intellectual work in a way that almost no other group or institution does. This new book took six years to research and write. My publisher in effect served as my patron while I worked on the project.

Jack Was Here. I Was There.

I've spent the last two evenings in the Big Town (that would be Des Moines, Iowa) hanging with my friend Jack McAuliffe, the "godfather" of craft brewing. (There are many other posts about Jack here at the blog; you can search for those, but this pair from Jay Brooks about the Great Trip to New Albion constitute my favorite online riffs on Jack.) (If you're not familiar with Jack and his work, see my book or this piece by John Holl.)  This morning there was a nice piece in the Big Town Daily (aka The Des Moines Register) by writer extraordinaire Kyle Munson.

And finally, there's this lovely photo, taken by a friend of Brian Fox, a local brewer.

Photo courtesy of Brian Fox

Many and sincere thanks to the people at Doll Distributing for bringing Jack to town; to Jeff Bruning for hosting the El Bait Shop event; to the folks at the Keg Stand (what a great place! Who knew?); and to Eric Sorensen and Jay Wilson for letting us crash the Rock Bottom party. And, of course, to the many people who attended the events. Thanks, thanks, thanks!

 

Let's Try a Little "Crowdsourcing," Shall We?

Okay, people. I can't say I'm wild about the whole crowdsourcing concept --- but I've also never tried it. And now's the perfect reason to do so.   Here's the deal: As some of you know, I HATE the title my publisher gave my forthcoming book.

IN BEEF WE TRUST:

AMERICANS, MEAT, AND THE MAKING OF A NATION

The problems with it are a) it sounds like it's only about beef, but the book cover beef, pork, and poultry (as well as cattle, hogs, and chickens); and b) the word "history" is nowhere to be found and this is a book work of history. (I should say there that I definitely don't hate the subtitle. It's okay, although obviously it would be better if it included the word "history.")

That title, in turn, spawned an equally icky proposed jacket design (hardly surprising that the one followed from the other).

First "draft" of the jacket design. January 2013.

I REALLY didn't like the title or the jacket, so I had a convo with my agent and he it turn talked to my editor. The upshot is that my editor indicated that she's willing to change the title IF I come up with something better. By which she apparently meant something better than the dozen-plus titles I've already run by her.

So. Want to help?

Here's a brief description of the book:

 The unexpected history of meat in America and how consumers, entrepreneurs, farmers, and food activists wrestled with the land and each other to build the world’s most elaborate, and controversial, meat supply system.

Here's a slightly longer description:

The moment European settlers arrived in North America, they began transforming the land into a livestock and meat-eater’s paradise. Even before revolution turned colonies into nation, Americans were eating meat on a scale the old world could neither imagine nor provide: an average European was lucky to see meat once a week, while even a poor American man put away about two hundred pounds a year. In BOOK TITLE, Ogle takes readers from that colonial paradise to the urban meat-making factories of the nineteenth century to the hyper-efficient packing plants of the late twentieth century. From Swift and Armour to Tyson, Cargill, and ConAgra. From the cattle bonanza of the 1880s to modern feedlots. From agribusiness to today’s “local” meat supplies and organic counter-cuisine. Along the way, Ogle explains how Americans’ carnivorous demands shaped urban landscapes, midwestern prairies, and western range, and why the American system of meat-making, for so long a source of pride, became a source of conflict and controversy.

Okay, people: give me a new title. If I decide to use any or all of something you suggest, you get your name in the acknowledgements. Right, right. Not a big deal, I know. But, hey, it's all I've got.