So --- I'm Not A Complete Idiot

This is a completely self-indulgent post, so by all means: ignore. (Well, who am I kidding. Writing blog posts or anything else is, by definition, an exercise in self-indulgence....)

I spend much of my time expounding on this, that, and the other thing. Journalists regularly interview me, mostly about beer, but sometimes about plumbing or Key West. I write op-ed pieces. I appear more-or-less regularly on Fox Business Network. In short, I put myself out there as Someone Who Knows Something. But -- I sometimes experience self-doubt (although I’m pretty sure I’m not the only person who does)

I mean, okay, so I’ve got a PhD in history. So I spent five years working on a book about beer and two years writing one about Key West and four years writing a thesis, dissertation, and then a book about plumbing. Do I know anything? Have I learned anything from my years of training and practice? When I’m sitting there on-camera or talking a reporter, do I REALLY know what the hell I’m talking about?

Apparently I do.

I learned this week when Pete Reid, the editor of Modern Brewery Age, interviewed Robert Weinberg. (Sorry, the MBA weekly is subscription-only). Weinberg was, during his long career (he’s in his eighties and at least semi-retired), the nation’s leading brewing industry analyst. Whatever there is to know or understand about American brewing, Bob Weinberg has it in his brain. I got a chance to meet and talk to him two years ago, and I assure you: He’s smart. Ultra smart.

Anyway, Pete asked Weinberg about the InBev acquisition of A-B, and what that event and the failing economy mean to A-B InBev and the rest of the industry. And according to Weinberg -- it means just about what I’ve been saying in print, at this blog, and on television for the past six months. (For any or all of it, see in particular my various related blog series. Links are on left side of your screen.)

Again, I can’t direct you to the interview, but it’s probably okay if I share a couple of quotes (it IS okay, isn’t it, Pete?) Said Weinberg regarding the InBev purchase:

I think we will see a level of competition now that the industry has not seen before. It will be a true battle of the titans.

He also said that InBev’s takeover “will likely change the corporate culture of A-B,” which would be, in his words,

a shame. . . . There was a human element to A-B, that had to do with the family ownership. There was a genuine pride, and they cared so much about the beer they made. If it just comes down to dollars and cents, some of that pride will evaporate.

There was more, the drift was -- Weinberg and I are on the same page. Apparently I’m not a complete idiot. Good to know. I’m thinking of this as Mr. Weinberg’s solstice-season gift to me.

__________________________________

All quotes from “Analyst Weinberg says ABI has big opportunities,” Modern Brewery Age 59, no. 50 (December 15, 2008): 5.

First Draft Follies: Larry McCavitt And The Committee For Real Ale

Welcome to First Draft Follies, an on-going series here at the blog. The material is presented "as is" from the first draft of the manuscript that became the book Ambitious Brew. In a few places I added one or two words in brackets -- [like this] -- for clarification.

This edition concerns the founding of an American organization called The Committee for Real Ale.

The time is the early 1970s. Philip Morris had recently purchased Miller Brewing and introduced Miller Lite. Schlitz Brewing Company was being investigated for tax fraud, and Miller and Anheuser-Busch were on the verge of the great battle for the title of Biggest Beermaker on the Planet. __________________________________________________________

Schlitz’s law-breaking ways. Miller’s mountain of cash. “Lite" beer. These things, Larry McCavitt believed, were ruining American beer. And, being both a product of the sixties and a “typical New England rebel, he decided to do something about it. (*1)

McCavitt grew up in an Irish, working-class family in Brockton, Massachusetts, just south of Boston, a town where son followed father into the shoe factory or textile mill. Beer was part of that world. McAvitt’s father and grand-father drank beer at neighborhood taverns, or at the Lithuanian Club, where old men set their glasses of draft beer--Schaefer or Narragansett--on "beer warmers," saucers of warm water.

In an earlier era, McCavitt would have stayed in Brockton, worked at a factory, and become an old man sipping beer at one or another of the dimly lit beer joints around town. But he was born in 1943, part of that post-war generation that wandered off their parents’ paths. When McAvitt graduated from high school in 1961, he headed for Boston and college, a “real step up for the son of shoe factory workers, and a door into a different world than his parents had known. (*2)

He dived into the day’s politics. He campaigned for Eugene McCarthy and attended the ‘68 convention as a McCarthy delegate. In 1970, McCavitt and two friends crossed the Atlantic for a three-month tour that took them from England and Ireland to Finland and the Soviet Union.

Like other Americans, they experienced revelation in a beer mug, tasting heretofore unknown ales and porters, stouts and lagers, visiting small and nearly ancient breweries that bore no resemblance to the giant Narragansett brewing factory back home.

McCavitt returned to Massachusetts and more politics. In the early seventies, he won a seat on the Brockton city council, intent on finding ways to challenge, change, and improve the system. Then in the mid-1970s, a friend attending school at Oxford told McCavitt about [a British organization,] CAMRA, and how it was altering the face of British drink.

Here was something Larry McCavitt understood: organized resistance. In October, 1976, he and two friends filed incorporation papers for the Committee for Real Ale (CRA), a non-profit association organized to "inspire, through constructive leadership and forceful action, the development of the brewing industry" and "to sponsor festivals conferences [sic] and courses for those interested in the brewing and consumption of real ales and beer." (*3)

The Massachusetts Secretary of State approved their papers in January, 1977, and the group celebrated with a launch party at the Black Rose, a Boston tavern "with a reputation for fine Irish stout." (*4) It’s time, McCavitt told a boisterous crowd, "for a beer drinkers [sic] revolt against the insipid beer of America." “‘It is the shame of our nation that in all of these United States a man can hardly find a decent glass of ale, excepting that which has been imported from another coutnry at a premium price." (*5)

Over the next few months, McCavitt and his two co-founders squeezed the beer campaign in amongst their jobs and other political activities. They solicited members (annual dues $5.00) and printed bumper stickers that read “THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND REAL ALE/ SUPPORT THE COMMITTEE FOR REAL ALE. (*6).

A quarterly newsletter provided information about good local beers and the taverns that carried them, as well as reports about small breweries in other parts of the country; and news from the frontlines of "THE GREAT BEER WAR." "Anheuser-Busch vs Philip Morris-Miller is guaranteed to go 15 rounds with no clear cut winner, least of all the beer drinking public." (*7)

McCavitt’s most important piece of promotion consisted of a letter to the editor of the New York Times, in which he commented on a recent Times article about the Miller v. Bud saga.

"The so-called competition that August A. Busch 3d refers to as the spice of life is ridiculous," wrote McCavitt. "It may be the spice of life to him and the other beer titans, but it is a cruel fraud to perpetrate on the American public. Not only is there not much spice left in the watered down liquid they are trying to pass off as beer, there is hardly any taste or anything else." (*8)

At its peak, the Committee for Real Ale had more than two hundred members, most in the New England area, but some living as far away as California. That was not enough to sustain the group, which fizzled when one of the founders left town to take a new job and the press of other matters left McCavitt with too little time to pursue the crusade.

But like Britain’s Society for Preservation of Beers From the Wood, McAvitt was only slightly ahead of his time. Unbeknownst to him, and even as his own Committee faded into history, another crusader two thousand miles away charged on to the field. (*9)

__________________________________________

SOURCES: *1: Lawrence McCavitt interview with Maureen Ogle, November 11, 2004.

*2. McCavitt interview.

*3: Copy of membership form provided by Lawrence McCavitt.

*4: Press release, The Committee for Real Ale; copy provided by Lawrence McCavitt.)

*5: "Beer Drinkers Now Fancy Themselves ‘Connoisseurs’ of Brew," Taunton Daily Gazette, January 19, 1977, p. 24; copy provided by Lawrence McCavitt.

*6: bumper sticker provided by Lawrence McCavitt.

*7: "The Great Beer War," newsletter, The Committee for Real Ale, volume IV. Copy provided by Lawrence McCavitt.

*8: Lawrence V. McCavitt, "Brewing Battle," New York Times, September 21, 1977, p. 3-3.

*9: See my series about the creation of the American Homebrewers Association. The series link leads to the last part of the series, which contains links to all the previous parts.

Second -- And Different -- Thoughts On Vilsack

Second Thoughts On Vilsack Okay -- I spent much of yesterday thinking about Obama’s nomination of Tom Vilsack as Secretary of Agriculture -- and have had second thoughts. And I retract my previous statement. This was a case where I was a bit too close to the situation and didn’t think it all the way through. (I live in Iowa and Vilsack governed the state from 1998 to 2006.)

My initial reaction was: huh? Couldn’t BHO find someone a bit more forward-thinking? But -- in fact, Vilsack engaged in plenty of forward and creative thinking during his two terms as governor. I can see, however, why others might doubt that. After all, Iowa is known primarily for Big Agriculture, and therefore lots of the much-reviled Big Subsidies.

But Vilsack worked hard as governor to force us Iowans to step back and take a second look at how we see “agriculture.” (Which isn’t that easy to do: farming is like air around here; it’s the last thing we notice...)

During his tenure, the state encouraged and fostered research and development in alternative fuels, bio-pharmaceuticals, alternative energy, organic farming, and “alternative” medicine (aka “eastern” medicines), much of which depends on plants. The state created agencies to help foster these areas of R&D, but it also encouraged the two research universities to devote time and resources to these issues.

Among other things, for example, Iowa State University now has a superb program in bioethics, because of course “agriculture” forces humans to deal with the social and ethical consequences of what we put in the ground. Iowa is also now, among the fifty states, the second-largest producer of wind power.

I should also add that although “ethanol” got a lot of attention the past few years, Vilsack encouraged researchers to think waaaaaaay byond corn-as-fuel. There are a number of research projects here in Ames exploring the use of other plants as fuel, including harvest leavings and weeds.

But here’s the point: Vilsack encouraged these efforts because he’s smart and willing to tackle complex problems, but also because he himself is not now and never has been a farmer. (He’s a lawyer.) His view of agriculture was that of an outsider and, as a result, was more forward-looking and creative than many of our previous governors who did come from farming backgrounds. (Indeed, as the news broke yesterday about Vilsack’s nomination, farmers around the state openly criticized the choice because Vilsack was NOT a farmer.)

And it’s worth pointing out that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is best served by someone who isn’t a farmer. Why? Because the “farming” and “agriculture” are only small components of the USDA’s responsibilties. Indeed, the department is charged with an incredible range of jobs and with developing and carrying out policies for food aid (including foodstamps), conservation, food safety, nutrition, food-related research, rural development, and the like.

So it’s useful to have someone like Vilsack. After all, agriculture is part of what happens here in Iowa, but it sure as hell isn’t the only thing. (Only Connecticut, for example, has a larger insurance industry.) Iowa is also a state that contains the richest soil in the world (I’m sitting on some of it as I type this), as well as some of the nation’s worst poverty. But Iowa isn't just farms, and so Vilsack also knows that the U.S. consists of cities and rural areas that need to figure out how to live in a digital world.

And I gather from yesterday’s news reports that yes, he’s learned how to use email (something he was rather proud of not knowing while he was governor, sad to say) and owns a blackberry. He’s also, as I noted yesterday, a decent human being. Yes, he’s a politician; don’t let his mild-mannered demeanor fool you. But -- Blagojevich, he ain’t.

Huh? Vilsack? VILSACK??

I think Obama finally did something to disappoint me. Vilsack for Ag Secretary? Huh? What am I missing? Don't get me wrong. Vilsack was a good governor here in Iowa. And he's a decent, honest human being. (Hmmmm. Maybe that's good enough for a federal official?? It would be a switch anyway.)

But -- I can't say he's the most out-of-the box guy. Certainly he's not the first person I'd think of to bring creative, out-of-the-box thinking to what is a post that badly needs some out-of-the-box thinking. (At the very least, I sure as hell hope he now knows how to use email, something that, as governor, he said he didn't know anything about....) I agree completely with Michael Pollan's assessment of the job of Ag Secretary

. Somehow, however, I can't quite see Vilsack in the role. On the other hand, maybe I'm missing something. Maybe there's more to Tom V. than he showed during his time as governor.

After all, we Iowans did dig (no pun intended) into organic and wind farming while he was governor. And hey, even Almost-President Obama is entitled to screw up once in awhile.

Oldsters (Yes, I'm One) And Alcohol

Hmmmmmm........ alcohol and "old" people. Good? Bad? You (apparently) be the judge. Worth reading.(*1)

While you're there, take a look at the rather horrifying story about why colonoscopies aren't what they're cracked up to be. (Odd coincidence that story: my husband just had one two weeks ago and I just scheduled my next one. Ugh.)

________________________________

*1: I love how the researchers and reporter define "older people" as over fifty. Hasn't anyone told them that fifty is the new thirty? I mean, do I look like an "old" person???? Don't answer that. (I'm fifty-five.)